top of page

MFEI News & Commentary

Search

Transformational Change Washes over the U.S. House. Observer Effect on Full Display

by Patrice Johnson

January 11, 2023


Friend,


Observation and uncertainty go hand in hand in quantum mechanics, and over four frenzied days last week, not even the logic-defying U.S. House of Representatives could deny the immutable laws of physics. As Republicans narrowly elected Kevin McCarthy as Speaker, the mysterious Observer Effect kicked in to trigger transformational change.


The Observer Effect holds that observing a situation necessarily changes it. Not maybe. Not sometimes. Necessarily. Now, it appears this quirky phenomenon that has the power to flip an itty-bitty photon from particle to wave has unleashed the winds of change across the fruited plains from kitchen tables to congressional podiums.


To quote Federalist reporter Emily Jashinsky,"The real story of McCarthy’s winding road to the speakership is bigger than he is, bigger than the GOP, and bigger than the 118th Congress.”


Observer Effect scores big


Evidence of the Observer Effect on full display can be seen in the image above. After witnessing 14 or so votes for Speaker of the House go down in flames, Rep. Mike Rogers (R-AL) boarded the crazy train and lunged at noncompliant Rep. Matthew Gaetz (R-FL). The ripple effects of Rogers losing his cool cost him a major committee position.


Rumor has it that Rep. Dan Crenshaw bloodied his knuckles in frustration after Gaetz voted for former President Donald J. Trump instead of Rep. McCarthy.


Each failed vote prodded McCarthy to agree to more demands of the 20-member Freedom Caucus. A senior congressional aide told The Federalist on Sunday that the concessions to the holdouts resulted in “the most significant win for conservatives in a decade, possibly the biggest in a generation." [editor bold]


The aide added, “The rules package, if adopted, will actually impact policy outcomes by forcing a transparent and open process.”


“Everything that Republicans and conservatives say they hate—giant, thousand-page spending bills negotiated by a handful of people with little input from anyone else, plum committee assignments reserved for insiders, and a closed off amendment process—is addressed here,” the aide said.



Concessions included: · A single member may call a vote to oust the Speaker · Votes on law maker term limits and border security · Freedom Caucus member on the Rules Committee · Pro McCarthy PAC stays out of ‘Safe’ primary races · Select Committee (AKA another Church Committee) on Weaponization of the DOJ · 72 hours to read a bill before it goes to the floor · Reveal salaries of government officials.


Observers of The Twitter Files are resetting the House trajectory


The release of the Twitter Files and a lawsuit from Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry exposed the government. Federalist reporter Joy Pullman wrote on Jan. 9:

Cross-referencing new information from “The Twitter Files” and a state attorneys general lawsuit against Big Tech with what we know about Spygate from years of investigations reinforces and enlarges shocking conclusions about the corruption of American government. Those two illuminate further how the U.S. bureaucracy interferes in elections, in these cases by pushing communications monopolies to shut down discourse that undermines the administrative state.

Now, thanks to shining a light on these illicit activities, the legislative branch may once again slam the brakes on the government's skulking about under cover of darkness and conducting influence campaigns on We the People (The Hoover Commission and the Church Committee tapped the brakes in years past, but the realignment appears to have worn off.).


Pullmann's article revealed all sorts of government agencies using strong-arm tactics, and their reach extended beyond Twitter to legacy media and Big Tech. Documents indicate three-letter government agencies applied--and are still applying--overwhelming pressure on Google, YouTube, Facebook, and others, even blogs with hardly any followers.


Resistance was futile. Even those few who pushed back eventually caved to Uncle Sam's pressure. All censored free speech on purely political topics, ranging from the Hunter Biden laptop to Afghanistan and Ukraine to the origins of COVID-19 and its vaccines.


Americans are ‘Impressionable’


In June 2016 Russia’s President Vladimir Putin said Americans are “impressionable” people. In hindsight, his choice of words spoke volumes, especially considering the research findings of Roger Epstein and Princeton University.


As Michigan Fair Elections (MFE) published in November 2022, Epstein's research on computer screen impressions, called ephemeral because they appear and disappear without record, indicates that each ephemeral can exert powerful subliminal influence on our thoughts and emotions.


Search results that favor one candidate…can shift the voting preferences of undecided voters by up to 80 percent in some demographic groups after a single search.


Epstein wrote, “In 2020, the 1.5 million ephemeral experiences…showed us manipulations that were sufficient, in theory, to have shifted more than six million votes to Joe Biden (whom I [Dr. Epstein] supported).”


Observed Effects, whether conscious or subliminal, change minds.


When a government controls communications in order to manipulate thought on political matters, it's called propaganda. Merriam Webster defines propaganda as "the spreading of ideas, information, or rumor for the purpose of helping or injuring an institution, a cause, or a person" and "ideas, facts, or allegations spread deliberately to further one's cause or to damage an opposing cause."


Totalitarian states are masters at it.


This leads us back to McCarthy’s election as Speaker.


The manipulation is ongoing


Today, in drafting this article, this writer tapped “McCarthy concessions” into a Google search. Here is a screenshot of the results:


Really? How could CNN possibly warrant two featured links, whereas Fox News and Newsmax, which host four or more times the viewers, are not listed at all? Where are the references to articles in the New York Post, the nation’s fourth largest daily? How about The Federalist? All have covered the topic.

The algorithms manipulating Google's search engine results appear to be alive and well.

The Church Committee

The Church Committee was a U.S. Senate select committee in 1975 that investigated abuses by the Central Intelligence Agency, National Security Agency, Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the Internal Revenue Service.

There we have it.

In observing and exposing government abuses, Elon Musk's release of the Twitter Files and a feisty Louisiana attorney general have let the Observer Effect genie out of its bottle.

Growing awareness, fortified with individual chutzpah, created sufficient pressure to force transformational changes in the U.S. House. Now, as the new Speaker launches a Church-Committee style investigation, as he agreed to do, the ripples from the Observer Effect may well surge to tidal waves of change.

This is how a government of the people and by the people is supposed to work.

A couple of bloodied knuckles, a threat of coming to fisticuffs--these are small prices to pay for a nation of free people correcting its course. Change doesn't come easily, so perhaps a few bumps and bruises are symptoms of a healthy representative government renewing and revitalizing itself.

A passionate commitment to ideals could prove the necessary ingredient for preserving our way of life. As Benjamin Franklin said, he and the other Founding Fathers gave us "a republic if you can keep it."

“From John Boehner to Paul Ryan to McCarthy, House conservatives are gradually shocking Republican leadership into representing their own voters,” Jashinsky wrote.

No one can predict where the upcoming select hearings on the Department of Justice will lead, but one thing is near certain: The act of observing will continue to expose, change, and rock our world. Kudos to those who are making a difference, if only in viewing this message.

I look forward to seeing you tomorrow at MFE's Zoom at Noon.


Members only. Sorry no press.






For election integrity in Michigan,


Patrice Johnson, Chair



Don't miss this Saturday's PIME meeting:



0 views0 comments

Komentar


Signup for Updates from MFEI!

We are a federated network of citizen organizations, leaders, and activists aligning their individual missions to work together to build a permanent election integrity infrastructure in every county in Michigan, to provide ongoing citizen oversight, transparency, and accountability of Michigan elections.

*Important Notes and Disclaimers for Election Integrity Network National Working Groups and coalition calls*

  • We operate under strict 501 (c)(3) non-profit, non-partisan guidelines. Please do not make any comments during the call or in the chat that are directly related to any campaign or candidate running for office or could be considered an endorsement or opposition of that candidate.

  • All calls are “off the record.” This means that no members of the media are allowed on our calls and this rule also applies to participants. No comment or presentation can be shared outside of the call without the express permission of the speaker. This includes the call "Notes" available to our participants. 

  • We always welcome new participants but ask that all newcomers register with their own registration link. Please do not forward your personal link to another participant.

  • For the security of the call, if you join by phone, you may be asked to unmute and provide your name. 

  • This meeting is for educational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice or instruction to lobby on behalf of any issue or organization.

© 2024 by Michigan Fair Elections Institute

bottom of page