top of page

Election Integrity News Blog

Search

MI Legislators File Federal Election-related Lawsuit. View Press Conference & Complaint Here


Click here to view complaint:

Complaint 9-28-23 (filed)
.pdf
Download PDF • 171KB


by Patrice Johnson | Sept. 28, 2023


Attorney Erick Kaardal and 11 state legislator plaintiffs minced no words today as they announced the filing of a federal election-related lawsuit. The claim, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan, alleges election officials violated state legislators’ rights.


“Michigan state election officials committed horrible violations of state legislators’ federal rights in 2018 and 2022, and continue to do so,” Kaardal declared during a press conference webinar announcing the suit. “Now, the Michigan Constitution contains federal elections regulations that are monuments to civil rights violations. We will need help from the federal courts to clean up the mess that the election officials created.”


Kaardal, a partner of Mohrman, Kaardal & Erickson, P.A., is representing the legislators.

Senator Jonathan Lindsey, one of the legislator plaintiffs, said, “The United States Constitution, the supreme law of the land, contains limited but critical election regulations.”


The U.S. Constitution, Article I, Section 4 (the Elections Clause), requires state legislatures to regulate the times, places, and manner of federal elections.

Michigan bypassed the state legislature and amended the state constitution with Proposal 2 of 2022 and Proposal 3 of 2018. This bypassing of the legislature violated legislator rights and usurped the legislature’s federally-mandated constitutional authority.


“We also have procedures in place at the state level to amend election law. However, these processes were violated in 2018 and 2022 when an alternative amendment process was used without regard to federal constitutional requirements,” Lindsey said. “This lawsuit challenges recent attempts to subvert our constitutional process and will protect against such actions in the future.”



Additional attorneys for the plaintiffs include Lansing-based David Kallman and Steve Kallman of the Kallman Legal Group, PLLC.


The lawsuit claims the 2018 and 2022 state constitutional amendments regulating the times, places, and manner of federal elections are legally null and void. The suit names Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson and Jonathan Brater as principal violators (defendants)..


Lindsey said progressives had tried and failed for years to pressure elected representatives to tear down safeguards that kept the state’s elections convenient and secure. “As an end-around, they used an unconstitutional process, then deceived the public into voting for changes that weaken our elections,” he said. “I don’t blame voters. They were told lies that made Proposal 2 sound good. Proponents ran ads saying this ''enshrines voter ID into our Constitution' when in fact Prop 2 guarantees the right to vote WITHOUT voter ID—a classic bait and switch tactic."


The state constitutional amendments to election law included provisions that allow voters to sign affidavits instead of presenting valid identification when voting in person or applying for an absentee ballot; nine days of early voting; private funding of election administration; no-excuse absentee voting procedures; same-day voter registrations; state-funded absentee ballot drop boxes, and independent redistricting commissions.


Rep. Steve Carra, a plaintiff and Chair of the Michigan House Freedom Caucus, agreed. “We’re seeing enormous outstate influence on our state’s elections. The far left struggles to win in a fair election, so their national strategy is to corrupt swing-state elections. One of their tactics is to trick the public into voting for unconstitutional changes to a state’s constitution, taking the legislature out of the election process.”



“The founders of this great republic put regulating elections into the hands of the state legislatures, so changes to the election process will undergo a deliberative and thoughtful process by the people’s elected representatives.” He cited the deceptive tactics that progressives, mostly from out-state Michigan, used to deceive the public into voting for Proposal 2.



Tiny print on a long and complex amendment. :Proposal 2, 2022.


Image of a deceptive flyer circulated throughout the state


Carra explained that of the total $31.7 million spent on the Proposal 2 campaign, $23.6 million, 74%, was expended in support. About half of that, $11.3 million, poured into Promote the Vote from the Sixteen Thirty Fund, a 501(c)4 nonprofit based in Washington D.C. The George Soros Open Society Foundation, a 501(c)3 nonprofit based in New York, accounted for $1.2 million.


Outstate funding.


“Despite the inflamed rhetoric coming from extremists, Michigan residents want fair and secure elections,” Carra emphasized, and he cited a recent Honest Elections Project (HEP) study that shows public support for photo ID laws has grown to an astounding 88% nationwide with 68% strongly agreeing that photo ID should be required when voting.




“Promote the Vote behaved like snake-oil salesmen to deceive Michiganders into amending the state constitution. They claimed it enshrined voter ID when the truth is the Proposal 2 amendment did just the opposite. It allows registrants to vote without valid identification.”


Carra noted, “The HEP study found that 86% of Americans think every election office should routinely undergo a full performance review and audit. “Prop 2 allows for nine days OR MORE of early voting, which is fiscally irresponsible and makes our elections ripe for fraud. We need to fix the problem now and restore legislative authority. Otherwise, the situation will continue to get worse.”


He cited the exorbitant and underestimated costs of Proposal 2:

**House or Senate Fiscal Agency analysis totals of all election bills passed this year, compiled by MFE


“The courts need to decide these important legal questions,” Senator Lindsey explained. “The people of Michigan are entitled to an answer on the scope and limitations of Article XII, section 2, amendment by petition, especially as it relates to the responsibilities granted to the state legislatures by the United States Constitution. I am honored to play a role in this effort to restore the rule of law in Michigan.”


According to both the U.S. Constitution and Michigan Constitution, only the state legislature has the authority to regulate the times, places, and manner of federal elections, so any election-related petition initiative that fails to gain legislative approval is illegal, the lawsuit claims. It warns that the unconstitutional process could be misused in 2024 and in the future.


Kaardal specializes in suing the government to improve it. Over the course of his three-decade career, Kaardal has achieved 61 election integrity counter-lawfare victories, including two U.S. Supreme Court wins.


Michigan Fair Elections and the Great Lakes Justice Center, sponsors of the lawsuit, are Michigan-based, non-profit 501(c)3 organizations. MFE is composed of local task forces dedicated to restoring fair and honest elections through education, local citizen participation in elections, and litigation. GLJC’s mission is to speak truth on behalf of the persecuted and most vulnerable and to champion the cause of the defenseless and oppressed.


“A lot of money was spent to deceive people,” Lindsey said. “Now these unlawfully enacted changes purport to limit our power as legislators to fix serious issues with our elections. Today I stand with fellow legislators to challenge that notion.”



 

Michigan Fair Elections is a fiercely independent, tax-exempt 501(c)3 charity. We operate entirely by unpaid volunteers and perform no contract work. We accept no government funds—not one penny. But we depend on voluntary contributions to fund our important, and sometimes costly, work. Legal claims are sometimes essential to improve the government and protect citizen rights, and they can be expensive.


Please support MFE's investigative research, honest journalism, and litigative actions to defend We the People's inalienable rights as protected in the U.S. Constitution. Donate today to assist our educational efforts to protect the principles of individual liberty in America.


 













Comments


bottom of page